Roman aqueducts and water supply hodge pdf
File Name: roman aqueducts and water supply hodge .zip
- Roman aqueducts and water supply hodge pdf files
- Roman aqueducts and water supply hodge pdf files
- The Water Revolutions in Rome
- Roman Aqueducts and Water Supply (Duckworth Archaeology)
Published November 12, by Duckworth Publishers.
Roman aqueducts and water supply hodge pdf files
The Romans constructed aqueducts throughout their Republic and later Empire , to bring water from outside sources into cities and towns.
Aqueduct water supplied public baths , latrines , fountains, and private households; it also supported mining operations, milling, farms, and gardens. Aqueducts moved water through gravity alone, along a slight overall downward gradient within conduits of stone, brick, or concrete ; the steeper the gradient, the faster the flow. Most conduits were buried beneath the ground and followed the contours of the terrain; obstructing peaks were circumvented or, less often, tunneled through. Where valleys or lowlands intervened, the conduit was carried on bridgework , or its contents fed into high-pressure lead, ceramic, or stone pipes and siphoned across.
Most aqueduct systems included sedimentation tanks, which helped to reduce any water-borne debris. Sluices , castella aquae distribution tanks and stopcocks regulated the supply to individual destinations. In cities and towns, the run-off water from aqueducts scoured the drains and sewers. Rome 's first aqueduct was built in BC, and supplied a water fountain at the city's cattle market. By the 3rd century AD, the city had eleven aqueducts, sustaining a population of over a million in a water-extravagant economy; most of the water supplied the city's many public baths.
Cities and towns throughout the Roman Empire emulated this model, and funded aqueducts as objects of public interest and civic pride, "an expensive yet necessary luxury to which all could, and did, aspire". Most Roman aqueducts proved reliable and durable; some were maintained into the early modern era, and a few are still partly in use. Methods of aqueduct surveying and construction are noted by Vitruvius in his work De architectura 1st century BC. The general Frontinus gives more detail in his official report on the problems, uses and abuses of Imperial Rome's public water supply.
Notable examples of aqueduct architecture include the supporting piers of the Aqueduct of Segovia , and the aqueduct-fed cisterns of Constantinople.
Dionysius of Halicarnassus , Roman Antiquities . Before the development of aqueduct technology, Romans, like most of their contemporaries in the ancient world, relied on local water sources such as springs and streams, supplemented by groundwater from privately or publicly owned wells, and by seasonal rain-water drained from rooftops into storage jars and cisterns.
Rome's aqueducts were not strictly Roman inventions — their engineers would have been familiar with the water-management technologies of Rome's Etruscan and Greek allies — but they proved conspicuously successful.
By the early Imperial era, the city's aqueducts supported a population of over a million, and an extravagant water supply for public amenities had become a fundamental part of Roman life. Water from aqueducts was also used to supply villas, ornamental urban and suburban gardens, market gardens, farms, and agricultural estates, the latter being the core of Rome's economy and wealth.
Rome had several springs within its perimeter walls but its groundwater was notoriously unpalatable; water from the river Tiber was badly affected by pollution and waterborne diseases.
The city's demand for water had probably long exceeded its local supplies by BC, when the city's first aqueduct, the Aqua Appia , was commissioned by the censor Appius Claudius Caecus. The Aqua Appia was one of two major public projects of the time; the other was a military road between Rome and Capua , the first leg of the so-called Appian Way.
Both projects had significant strategic value, as the Third Samnite War had been under way for some thirty years by that point. The road allowed rapid troop movements; and by design or fortunate coincidence, most of the Aqua Appia ran within a buried conduit, relatively secure from attack. It was fed by a spring A second aqueduct, the Aqua Anio Vetus , was commissioned some forty years later, funded by treasures seized from Pyrrhus of Epirus.
Its flow was more than twice that of the Aqua Appia, and supplied water to higher elevations of the city. By BC, the city had again outgrown its combined supplies. An official commission found the aqueduct conduits decayed, their water depleted by leakage and illegal tapping. The praetor Quintus Marcius Rex restored them, and introduced a third, "more wholesome" supply, the Aqua Marcia , Rome's longest aqueduct and high enough to supply the Capitoline Hill.
The works cost ,, sesterces. Aqueduct-building programmes in the city reached a peak in the Imperial Era; credit for the provision of public water supplies passed from mutually competitive Republican political magnates to the emperors. Augustus' reign saw the building of the Aqua Virgo , and the short Aqua Alsietina. The latter supplied Trastevere with large quantities of non-potable water for its gardens and was used to create an artificial lake for staged sea-fights to entertain the populace.
Another short Augustan aqueduct supplemented the Aqua Marcia with water of "excellent quality". Most of Rome's aqueducts drew on various springs in the valley and highlands of the Anio, the modern river Aniene , east of the Tiber. A complex system of aqueduct junctions, tributary feeds and distribution tanks supplied every part of the city. By the late 3rd century AD, the city was supplied with water by 11 state-funded aqueducts. Modern estimates of the city's supply, based on Frontinus' own calculations in the late 1st century, range from a high of 1,, cubic meters per day to a more conservative ,—, cubic meters per day, supplying an estimated population of 1,, The end of the ancient aqueducts began with the Ostrogoths in the siege of who cut the supply to the city, while Belisarius , the general of Rome, closed the inlets to prevent the Ostrogoths from using them as access routes.
Some were partially put back into operation, but from the 9th century the demographic collapse and the lack of technical and economic resources meant that no-one took care of maintenance anymore, the pipes were no longer usable and the Romans returned to drawing water from the river, wells and springs. Hundreds of similar aqueducts were built throughout the Roman Empire. Many of them have since collapsed or been destroyed, but a number of intact portions remain. The Zaghouan Aqueduct , Whether state-funded or privately built, aqueducts were protected and regulated by law.
Any proposed aqueduct had to be submitted to the scrutiny of civil authorities. Permission from the senate or local authorities was granted only if the proposal respected the water rights of other citizens; on the whole, Roman communities took care to allocate shared water resources according to need.
To this end, state funded aqueducts reserved a wide corridor of land, up to 15 feet each side of the aqueduct's outer fabric. Ploughing, planting and building were prohibited within this boundary. Such regulation was necessary to the aqueduct's long-term integrity and maintenance but was not always readily accepted or easily enforced at a local level, particularly when ager publicus was understood to be common property, to be used for whatever purpose seemed fit.
Some privately built or smaller municipal aqueducts may have required less stringent and formal arrangements. Springs were by far the most common sources for aqueduct water; for example, most of Rome's supply came from various springs in the Anio valley and its uplands. Spring-water was fed into a stone or concrete springhouse, then entered the aqueduct conduit. Scattered springs would require several branch conduits feeding into a main channel.
Some systems drew water from open, purpose-built, dammed reservoirs, such as the two still in use that supplied the aqueduct at the provincial city of Emerita Augusta. The territory over which the aqueduct ran had to be carefully surveyed to ensure the water would flow at a consistent and acceptable rate for the entire distance. They checked horizontal levels with a chorobates , a flatbedded wooden frame fitted with a water level.
Courses and angles could be plotted using a groma , a relatively simple apparatus that was eventually displaced by the more sophisticated dioptra , a precursor of the modern theodolite. In Book 8 of his De architectura , Vitruvius describes the need to ensure a constant supply, methods of prospecting, and tests for potable water.
Greek and Roman physicians knew the association between stagnant or tainted waters and water-borne disease. In his De Medicina , the encyclopaedist Celsus warned that public bathing could induce gangrene in unhealed wounds. The adverse health effects of lead on those who mined and processed it were also well known, and for this reason, ceramic pipes were preferred over lead.
Where lead pipes were used, a continuous water-flow and the inevitable deposition of water-borne minerals within the pipes somewhat reduced the water's contamination by soluble lead. Nevertheless, the level of lead was times higher than in local spring waters. Most Roman aqueducts were flat-bottomed, arch-section conduits that ran 0. Early conduits were ashlar -built but from around the late Republican era, brick-faced concrete was often used instead. The concrete used for conduit linings was usually waterproof , with a very smooth finish.
The flow of water depended on gravity alone. The volume of water transported within the conduit depended on the catchment hydrology — rainfall, absorption, and runoff — the cross section of the conduit, and its gradient; most conduits ran about two-thirds full. The conduit's cross section was also determined by maintenance requirements; workmen must be able to enter and access the whole, with minimal disruption to its fabric.
Vitruvius recommends a low gradient of not less than 1 in for the channel, presumably to prevent damage to the structure through erosion and water pressure. This value agrees well with the measured gradients of surviving masonry aqueducts. The gradients of temporary aqueducts used for hydraulic mining could be considerably greater, as at Dolaucothi in Wales with a maximum gradient of about and Las Medulas in northern Spain.
Where sharp gradients were unavoidable in permanent conduits, the channel could be stepped downwards, widened or discharged into a receiving tank to disperse the flow of water and reduce its abrasive force. Some aqueduct conduits were supported across valleys or hollows on arches of masonry, brick or concrete; the Pont du Gard , one of the most impressive surviving examples of a massive masonry multiple-piered conduit, spanned the Gardon river-valley some Where particularly deep or lengthy depressions had to be crossed, inverted siphons could be used, instead of arched supports; the conduit fed water into a header tank, which fed it into pipes.
The pipes crossed the valley at lower level, supported by a low "venter" bridge, then rose to a receiving tank at a slightly lower elevation. This discharged into another conduit; the overall gradient was maintained. Siphon pipes were usually made of soldered lead, sometimes reinforced by concrete encasements or stone sleeves. Less often, the pipes themselves were stone or ceramic, jointed as male-female and sealed with lead. Nonetheless, siphons were versatile and effective if well-built and well-maintained.
A horizontal section of high-pressure siphon tubing in the Aqueduct of the Gier was ramped up on bridgework to clear a navigable river, using nine lead pipes in parallel, cased in concrete. At Arles, a minor branch of the main aqueduct supplied a local suburb via a lead siphon whose "belly" was laid across a riverbed, eliminating any need for supporting bridgework. Roman aqueducts required a comprehensive system of regular maintenance. The "clear corridors" created to protect the fabric of underground and overground conduits were regularly patrolled for unlawful ploughing, planting, roadways and buildings.
In De aquaeductu , Frontinus describes the penetration of conduits by tree-roots as particularly damaging. Accretions within syphons could drastically reduce flow rates through their already narrow diameters, though some had sealed openings that might have been used as rodding eyes , possibly using a pull-through device. In Rome, where a hard-water supply was the norm, mains pipework was shallowly buried beneath road kerbs, for ease of access; the accumulation of calcium carbonate in these pipes would have necessitated their frequent replacement.
The aqueducts were under the overall care and governance of a water commissioner curator aquarum ; this was a high status, high-profile appointment. In 97, Frontinus served both as consul and as curator aquarum , under the emperor Nerva. Under the emperor Claudius , Rome's contingent of imperial aquarii comprised a familia aquarum of people both slave and free, funded through a combination of Imperial largesse and the water taxes and fees paid by private individuals. The familia aquarum was supervised by an Imperial freedman, who held office as procurator aquarium.
Full closure of any aqueduct for servicing would have been a rare event, kept as brief as possible, with repairs preferably made when water demand was lowest, during the winter months. Frontinus also describes the use of temporary leaden conduits to carry the water past damaged stretches while repairs were made, with minimal loss of supply. Aqueduct mains could be directly tapped, but they more usually fed into public distribution terminals, known as castellum aquae "water castles" , which acted as settling tanks and cisterns and supplied various branches and spurs, via lead or ceramic pipes.
These pipes were made in 25 different standardised diameters and were fitted with bronze stopcocks. The flow from each pipe calix could therefore be fully or part-opened, or shut down, and its supply diverted to any other part of the system in which water-demand was, for the time being, outstripping supply. The free supply of water to public basins and drinking fountains was officially prioritised over the supply to the public baths; a small fee was charged to every bather, on behalf of the Roman people.
Roman aqueducts and water supply hodge pdf files
The Romans constructed aqueducts throughout their Republic and later Empire , to bring water from outside sources into cities and towns. Aqueduct water supplied public baths , latrines , fountains, and private households; it also supported mining operations, milling, farms, and gardens. Aqueducts moved water through gravity alone, along a slight overall downward gradient within conduits of stone, brick, or concrete ; the steeper the gradient, the faster the flow. Most conduits were buried beneath the ground and followed the contours of the terrain; obstructing peaks were circumvented or, less often, tunneled through. Where valleys or lowlands intervened, the conduit was carried on bridgework , or its contents fed into high-pressure lead, ceramic, or stone pipes and siphoned across. Most aqueduct systems included sedimentation tanks, which helped to reduce any water-borne debris.
shared with Roman aqueducts (Hodge , 27 to 28). The predecessors of the Romans in Italy, the Etr-. uscans, had no aqueducts, but excelled.
The Water Revolutions in Rome
Search this site. Absolute Beginners PDF. Advances in Surgery, PDF.
Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Want to Read saving…. Want to Read Currently Reading Read.
Roman Aqueducts and Water Supply (Duckworth Archaeology)
Access options available:. Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press, Sextus Iulius Frontinus, according to the younger Pliny one of the two most distinguished spectatissimos men in late first-century Rome Ep.
This article discusses the considerable Greek and Roman expertise in hydraulic engineering. Wells were the earliest and simplest form of artificial water supply. Most domestic wells, and many public wells, were either circular or square, just large enough for the digger. Cisterns were developed as an alternative to wells. Cisterns of all kinds were waterproofed by the application of mortar linings. The development and spread of qanats shows the availability and use at an early date of complex and difficult engineering water schemes in communities outside the main civic centers.
Summary Aqueducts built by the Romans mostly date to the Imperial period, though Aqueducts and Water Supply. A. Trevor Hodge.
The Eighth Wonder of the World
Qty : Please note there is a week delivery period for this title. How did a Roman waterworks work? How were the aqueducts planned and built? What happened to the water before it arrived in the aqueduct and after it left, in catchment, urban distribution and drainage? What were the hydraulics and drainage involved?
Fresh water supply is essential especially in dry regions. Other civilizations built water transportation systems, before the Romans A qanat The Trevi Fountain in Rome still gets fed an ancient aqueduct even Before aqueducts, Romans relied on local water sources such as Ancient Roman Aqueducts. An aqueduct is a water supply or navigable channel constructed to convey water. In modern engineering, the term is used for any The need to build aqueducts in Rome was prompted the need for mass supply of water to the population. The Romans were well known for Rome's water supply system was one of the marvels of the ancient world. After all, who has not heard of the aqueducts?
Safe drinking water is arguably the most important yet underappreciated resource in the world. The total world population in was 7. The first water revolution, named Water 1. The second revolution, Water 2. Water 3. Finally, Water 4.
- Мы же говорим не о реверсии какой-либо сложной функции, а о грубой силе. PGP, Lucifer, DSA - не важно.